American force dangers delusions and dilemmas in national security

Posted on by

American Force

american force dangers delusions and dilemmas in national security

nishiohmiya-golf.com: American Force: Dangers, Delusions, and Dilemmas in National Security (A Council on Foreign Relations Book) (): Richard Betts: .

and    how long will my root canal be sore   watch how i met your mother season 5 episode 10

Library's Website. Library Locations and Hours. Log In. My Account. Thank you for using the catalog. Search For:.

In order to set up a list of libraries that you have access to, you must first login or sign up. Then set up a personal list of libraries from your profile page by clicking on your user name at the top right of any screen. You also may like to try some of these bookshops , which may or may not sell this item. The National Library may be able to supply you with a photocopy or electronic copy of all or part of this item, for a fee, depending on copyright restrictions. Separate different tags with a comma. To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes.

While American national security policy has grown moreinterventionist since the Cold War, Washington has also hoped toshape the world on the cheap. Misled.
can dogs eat chicken wings

United States. Defense and Security. While American national security policy has grown more interventionist since the Cold War, Washington has also hoped to shape the world on the cheap. Misled by the stunning success against Iraq in , administrations of both parties have pursued ambitious aims with limited force, committing the country's military frequently yet often hesitantly, with inconsistent justification. These ventures have produced strategic confusion, unplanned entanglements, and indecisive results. This collection of essays by Richard K. Betts, a leading international politics scholar, investigates the use of American force since the end of the Cold War, suggesting guidelines for making it more selective and successful.

Thank you! Betts criticizes a "profoundly confused" policy that "abetted slow-motion savagery" in Bosnia, for example, and recommends a set of standards by which to determine when military intervention for humanitarian purposes is likely to be a worthwhile option. The author also explores the nature of the changing threat from WMD, appropriate responses to terrorism and insurgency, serious concerns about the possibility of military conflict with China, appropriate levels of defense funding and whether the entire concept of strategy in military affairs has any meaning. Betts does not shill for any particular ideology; he presents closely, sometimes densely reasoned arguments for his conclusions. There was a problem adding your email address. Please try again. Be the first to discover new talent!

Richard K. New York: Columbia University Press, American Force begins with a discussion of the evolution of American national security thinking following the end of the Cold War. Instead, America embarked on an expansionistic strategy based on a unipolar view of the world, in which Western philosophies and methodologies, based on the rule of law, would be imposed on recalcitrant states. In retrospect, this approach has been wrong. Rather than a more peaceful world, ingrained habits on the part of both liberals and conservatives, fostered by forty years of uneasy coexistence with an enemy inimically opposed to Western political and economic ideals, have led to less security for the United States. The failure to adequately redress this shortcoming in policy poses an increasing danger to the West in general and the United States in particular.



Questions?

Uh-oh, it looks like your Internet Explorer is out of date. - Betts Columbia University Press.

American Force: Dangers, Delusions, and Dilemmas in National Security

A lengthy absence from the academic world can make returning to graduate school an intimidating proposition. Those of us who have been military practitioners more than theorizers over the past decade have found it necessary to push aside introspective thought in favor of preparing for the current or next challenge. When the time finally comes to make the leap back i nto academia and expand our minds' ability to think critically about the world, we inevitably face some start-up costs: recalling and dusting off long-forgotten theories, catching up on domestic and international events and their consequences, recalling the lessons of history that apply to current realities, and thinking critically about where we stand as citizens and professionals. If I could recommend one book to a friend who is preparing to embark on a graduate-level study of national security in general or defense analysis in particular, Richard K. This collection of essays, some not previously published and others recently revised, focuses on the United States' role as the sole postCold War superpower and the current threats to its continued peace and security. Betts's dedication of the book to a young Army officer killed in Iraq at the height of the surge in may initially lead the reader to think that American Force is an overall condemnation of American interventionism and militarism, typified by the second invasion of Iraq in

.

.


what is a result of the development of civilized society

.

5 thoughts on “American force dangers delusions and dilemmas in national security

Leave a Reply